Born on Third Base 1
The first half of
Chuck Collins’, “Born on Third Base” covers the possible ways to take steps
towards an equal society by wealth redistribution. The heir of the Oscar Meyer
fortune donated half of his several million-dollar trust fund in effort to live
a more equal life. He breaks down exactly who the one percenters are and the
fact that most of the world’s wealth lays in the hands of about 550 ultra
wealthy people. He writes (and speaks) on topics that are especially difficult
to discuss as the wealth gap grows.
He writes in a frank
style giving many anecdotes to support his assertions. The book is a good
source of information of the history of government subsidies throughout
generations and how they are affecting today’s world. However cracking
inequality is a discussion that takes years of understanding the past and hard
analysis into the future. This is impossible to do in 200-something pages, thus
Collins’ book scratches the surface of the issue, but offers necessary baby
steps to reaching greater equality in the US.
Though I agree with
his supporting the estate tax and giving effort where effort is due, I think
the situation is more dire. He says the reason the redistribution of wealth doesn’t
happen sooner is because people are acting with more hate rather than
understanding against those who hold the greatest wealth in America. He
believes if either party wants to make progress we must do things like “crack
open hearts” and tell the one percent that they are valid; This and only this
is the way to putting the “I gained my wealth all on my own” dialogue to rest
according Collins’ book.
Though I agree with
what Collins supports, I believe his premise for how we get out of this mess is
misconstrued. Even if wealth is redistributed, the greedy will always bend the
rules in their favor. Once power is given, more is always craved. The reason we
are all in the mess of this wage gap is because of institutional complexes that
hold back minorities and push forward those who are already wealthy (mainly
white men). There was no moral backing to those systems then and I don’t understand
what makes Collins the system will change by ‘cracking hearts.’
Comments
Post a Comment